For Your Inebriation
  • Games
  • "Shooter" Reviews
  • Who we Are
  • How we Roll
  • Contact Us

The Hunger Games: Mockingjay Part 1

11/26/2014

0 Comments

 

"Fire is Catching. And if We Burn, You Will Burn With Us."

Picture
Any association with the Mockingjay symbol will result in extreme punishment. So I guess millions of movie goers this week are completely screwed. “Mockingjay: Part 1” CLEANED UP.
“The Hunger Games” films have stood as the shining example of what makes a good adaptation. Time and time again, the films have not just faithfully taken writer Suzanne Collins’ words and put them on a screen, but ELEVATED the source material. Every flaw that you could mention about “The Hunger Games” books, like the strange pacing, Katniss’s sometimes meandering and irritating internal dialogue, the melodramatic plot twists…director Frances Collins especially (who also directed the previous installment, “Catching Fire”) uses tight, quick filmmaking and an astounding understanding of time management to turn what could have been a sophomoric mess into an intensely relevant masterpiece. No disrespect to Suzanne. The books are fantastic, and her brilliant character work and world-building talents have brought her much deserved praise, but the films really bring out the core ideas of her work and strengthen them, make them pop. The films are about revolution and the tactics of tyranny, and they never stray a hair from exploring those themes.

“Mockingjay Part 1” is unfortunately the weakest of the films so far, and will probably keep that title once the second part comes out. Splitting up this final installment into two films, while once again a great money-making scheme, doesn’t make much sense cinematically. The film suffers from a lot of the same problems that “Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part 1” suffered from, specifically pacing and the lack of any real action. The first half of “Mockingjay” is all setup for the big climactic finish, and Collins makes sure not to blow her wad until the final showdown is well underway. That means the first half of the book is rehashing information, planning a few steps ahead, various instances of plotting on both sides of the war, and some warping of the love triangle that’s been set up (which thankfully, while still present in the film, is framed to serve the larger story). All this means that, for a lot of people who are only watching the films, nothing is happening. It all feels like padding, each event a meaningless blip in the larger scope of the plot. Characters like Effie and Gale are sidelined because they don’t have much to do. It all feels unfinished. I don’t blame anyone who feels this way.

This does nothing to diminish my excitement for this series. The film once again finds that perfect balance between realism and fantasy that draws people to the seats. As I mentioned before, these films are about revolution, and while American cinema likes to make a lot of movies about war, big budget studios tend to shy away from films about uprisings, particularly when it comes from society’s youth. As some have pointed out, the influence of the films reaches far beyond our borders. The creators have captured flame in a bottle, and are pulling few punches when showing people what fire can do.

Fire is catching.
0 Comments



Leave a Reply.

    Base Rules

    1. Thou shalt drink whenever a character on screen drinks

    2. Thou shalt drink when a character speaks of his or her severe Daddy Issues

    3. Thou shalt drink for Title Drops

    4. Thou shalt drink joyously

    5. Thou shalt drink responsibly

    Archives

    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014

    Categories

    All

    RSS Feed

Proudly powered by Weebly
Photo used under Creative Commons from Iwan Gabovitch